- News & Publications
- Carter Ledyard Client Vaad L’Hafotzas Sichos Wins Trademark Victory After Trial
Carter Ledyard Client Vaad L’Hafotzas Sichos Wins Trademark Victory After Trial
Carter Ledyard client Vaad L’Hafotzas Sichos recently prevailed after a four day bench trial in Brooklyn federal court. The trademark case, Vaad L’Hafotzas Sichos v. Kehos Publication Society, et al, arose out of attempts by Defendant Merkos L’Inyonei Chinuch, one of the major Chabad corporations, to stop Vaad’s publication of books with a particular logo. Vaad, the editors and publishers of the Lubavitcher Rebbe’s discourses, had been given permission by the Rebbe to use the logo on their publications almost 40 years ago, and had spent millions of dollars publishing the works, known as the Likkutei Sichos. On January 14, 2016, Judge Frederic Block ruled that the trademark (the Kehos logo) was relatively weak and that the principle of laches applied, preventing Merkos from stopping Vaad’s use of the logo. In reaching that holding, the Court found that Vaad had acted in good faith when it continued to use the logo during the decades since the physical passing of the Lubavitcher Rebbe, in 1994. The dispute arose when Vaad refused Merkos’s demands that they use the appellation “of blessed memory” after the Lubavitcher Rebbe’s name on the cover and title page of the books. Rabbi Zalman Chanin, the Director of Vaad, stated “one of the highlights of the trial was when our lead trial lawyer, Mitchell C. Shapiro, cross-examined Rabbi Yehudah Krinsky, and elicited the admission that the Rebbe had dictated a will of succession leaving others in charge of Merkos, that Rabbi Krinsky did not know the criteria that the Rebbe used in granting permission to use the Kehos logo, or the capacity in which the Rebbe was sitting when making such decisions. Shapiro was effectively representing the Rebbe and enforcing the Rebbe’s will as his emissary.”
Litigation partner Mitchell C. Shapiro and associate Brandon J. Isaacson represented Vaad L’Hafotzas Sichos at trial.
Michael served on a panel hosted by Wilmington Trust designed to provide T&E professionals current information and trends impacting the T&E practice today.
Judge Alison J. Nathan adopted a report that determined that the iconic artwork, "The Mechanism of Meaning" by Shusaku Arakawa, and associated intellectual property rights, must be litigated in the New York Surrogate’s…
Carter Ledyard client Munro Investment Group Pty Ltd. saw the oppositions of two trademark applications dismissed by a panel of three Administrative Law Judges of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board.
Faith served on a panel that covered market participants, regulators and industry experts, meant to enhance the ability to combat retail investor fraud.
The M&A Advisor's Emerging Leaders Awards recognize individuals under the age of 40 who have achieved significant success in the M&A industry.
Designed to showcase those exhibiting excellence in the practice of law, Super Lawyers® named forty Carter Ledyard attorneys to this year's list.
The Committee addresses issues related to estate planning, trust and law practice and the operation of Surrogate's Courts.
Fifteen attorneys across ten practice areas were named by Best Lawyers in their annual The Best Lawyers in America® rankings.
Mr. McSloy taught at the College's semi-annual Leadership & Governance Certificate Program, designed for current and aspiring tribal leaders.
Jeff Boxer spoke with the New York Law Journal about the quality of services provided by a mid-sized law firm like Carter Ledyard.
Ms. Wallace has been a partner at CLM since 2017 and practices Art Law, Environmental Law and Litigation.
Carter Ledyard filed an action in Manhattan's Federal District Court against Pinduoduo, Inc., a multi-billion dollar Chinese-language social e-commerce app.
Ms. Lockhart, Chair of the firm's Labor and Employment practice group, served as a panelist for DeWitt Stern/Risk Strategies' EPL program.
Client Kaneka Corporation was awarded a default judgment against a Chinese importer...
Ms. Mann was asked to comment on the lawsuit alleging that the Trump Foundation charity used funds for personal and political purposes.